TARPY v. U.S., 2:12CV00182 BSM. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130612777
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2013
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff's objections have been reviewed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion for summ
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff's objections have been reviewed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion for summa..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff's objections have been reviewed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 21] is GRANTED.
2. The complaint [Doc. No. 2] is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
3. It is further certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from the order adopting this recommendation and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
