MARSHALL v. WALKER, 5:11CV00239 BSM. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130619885
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2013
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 98] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. N
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 98] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 98] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 88] is granted, and this case is dismissed with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
