Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JONES v. GOLDEN, 5:12CV00423-JLH-JTK. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20130711730 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2013
Summary: ORDER JEROME T. KEARNEY, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 34). Plaintiff filed a Response, Brief and Declaration, in opposition to the Motion (Doc. Nos. 46-48). In Plaintiff's Response, he relies heavily on some answers to interrogatories filed in another lawsuit, Jones v. Conrad, et al., 5:10CV00355-BSM-JJV (Doc. No. 47, pp. 31-44). The Court considers this material as "matters outside the pleadings," and will treat the present Mo
More

ORDER

JEROME T. KEARNEY, Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 34). Plaintiff filed a Response, Brief and Declaration, in opposition to the Motion (Doc. Nos. 46-48). In Plaintiff's Response, he relies heavily on some answers to interrogatories filed in another lawsuit, Jones v. Conrad, et al., 5:10CV00355-BSM-JJV (Doc. No. 47, pp. 31-44). The Court considers this material as "matters outside the pleadings," and will treat the present Motion as one for Summary Judgment, pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 12(d). Accordingly,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 34) shall be construed as a Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants shall file a brief, and any relevant evidence in support of such (including affidavits), within twenty days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff shall file a Response to Defendants' filings within fifteen days thereafter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer