G&K SERVICES CO., INC. v. BILL'S SUPER FOODS, INC., 3:08CV00048-JJV. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130802618
Visitors: 28
Filed: Aug. 01, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2013
Summary: ORDER JOE J. VOLPE, Magistrate Judge. Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 229) is DENIED without prejudice. I recognize that the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act allows for reasonable attorney's fees. Defendant argues that the ADTPA trumps the rule that there can be only one prevailing party, and only the prevailing party is entitled to attorney's fees. However, it provided no authority to support this proposition. If Defendant has case law that specifically states that th
Summary: ORDER JOE J. VOLPE, Magistrate Judge. Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 229) is DENIED without prejudice. I recognize that the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act allows for reasonable attorney's fees. Defendant argues that the ADTPA trumps the rule that there can be only one prevailing party, and only the prevailing party is entitled to attorney's fees. However, it provided no authority to support this proposition. If Defendant has case law that specifically states that the..
More
ORDER
JOE J. VOLPE, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 229) is DENIED without prejudice.
I recognize that the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act allows for reasonable attorney's fees. Defendant argues that the ADTPA trumps the rule that there can be only one prevailing party, and only the prevailing party is entitled to attorney's fees. However, it provided no authority to support this proposition.
If Defendant has case law that specifically states that the ADTPA trumps the prevailing party rule, Defendant must provide it by 5:00 p.m., Thursday, August 8, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
