SPENCER v. SAMUELS, 2:12-cv-209-DPM-BD. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130807708
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2013
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. Spencer has not objected to Magistrate Judge Beth M. Deere's recommendation, N o 37, that the Court dismiss his claims against Samuels — the only remaining defendant — because Spencer did not exhaust his claims against Samuels through the BOP's administrative process. Reviewing for clear error of fact on the face of the record and legal error, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Note), the Court adopts Judge Deere's recommen
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. Spencer has not objected to Magistrate Judge Beth M. Deere's recommendation, N o 37, that the Court dismiss his claims against Samuels — the only remaining defendant — because Spencer did not exhaust his claims against Samuels through the BOP's administrative process. Reviewing for clear error of fact on the face of the record and legal error, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Note), the Court adopts Judge Deere's recommend..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
Spencer has not objected to Magistrate Judge Beth M. Deere's recommendation, No 37, that the Court dismiss his claims against Samuels — the only remaining defendant — because Spencer did not exhaust his claims against Samuels through the BOP's administrative process. Reviewing for clear error of fact on the face of the record and legal error, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Note), the Court adopts Judge Deere's recommendation in full. Samuels's motion for summary judgment, No 29, is granted on non-exhaustion. Spencer's claims against Samuels are dismissed without prejudice.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
