Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DODDS v. CORIZON, INC., 5:11-cv-291-DPM-BD. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20130807715 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2013
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's partial recommended disposition, NQ 159. No one has objected. Seeing no legal error or clear error of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (Advisory Committee Notes to 1983 Addition), the Court adopts the proposal as its own. * The defendants' motion for summary judgment, NQ 149, is granted. Dodds's claims against Corizon, Inc., Dream Redick-Young, Deborah York, and Dr. Shirle
More

ORDER

D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.

The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's partial recommended disposition, NQ 159. No one has objected. Seeing no legal error or clear error of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (Advisory Committee Notes to 1983 Addition), the Court adopts the proposal as its own.* The defendants' motion for summary judgment, NQ 149, is granted. Dodds's claims against Corizon, Inc., Dream Redick-Young, Deborah York, and Dr. Shirley Barnes are dismissed without prejudice. His claims against Dr. Samuel Houston and Beverly Simmons remain.

So Ordered.

FootNotes


* The typo in the last line of page 5-2009 should be 2008—is corrected. The PRD correctly analyzed the limitations issue. NQ 159 at 2.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer