NORWOOD v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, 5:13CV00026 BSM. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130826438
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 23, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2013
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young has been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant's motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 12] is granted, and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. 2. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purpose
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young has been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant's motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 12] is granted, and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. 2. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young has been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendant's motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 12] is granted, and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice.
2. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3. It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
Source: Leagle
