FOX v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, 5:13CV00189 JLH/HDY. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130827a47
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2013
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against the Arkans
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against the Arkansa..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against the Arkansas Department of Correction are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the Arkansas Department of Correction is removed as a party defendant.
Source: Leagle
