CHANDLER v. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., 3:12-CV-00104-BRW. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130904781
Filed: Sep. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2013
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON, District Judge. Pending is Plaintiffs' Second Motion to Compel against Defendants APAC-Tennessee Inc. (Doc. No. 76). Since the Motion was filed, Plaintiffs' lawyer, Mr. John Ogles, has advised the Court that APAC need not respond because the parties are in the midst of resolving their disputes. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion is DENIED without prejudice. If the lawyers are unable to resolve their disputes, Plaintiffs may file a new motion with the Court. IT IS SO ORD
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON, District Judge. Pending is Plaintiffs' Second Motion to Compel against Defendants APAC-Tennessee Inc. (Doc. No. 76). Since the Motion was filed, Plaintiffs' lawyer, Mr. John Ogles, has advised the Court that APAC need not respond because the parties are in the midst of resolving their disputes. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion is DENIED without prejudice. If the lawyers are unable to resolve their disputes, Plaintiffs may file a new motion with the Court. IT IS SO ORDE..
More
ORDER
BILLY ROY WILSON, District Judge.
Pending is Plaintiffs' Second Motion to Compel against Defendants APAC-Tennessee Inc. (Doc. No. 76). Since the Motion was filed, Plaintiffs' lawyer, Mr. John Ogles, has advised the Court that APAC need not respond because the parties are in the midst of resolving their disputes.
Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion is DENIED without prejudice. If the lawyers are unable to resolve their disputes, Plaintiffs may file a new motion with the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
