AMOS v. HOBBS, 5:13CV00058 SWW. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130314a32
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. 1 After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. 1 After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (..
More
ORDER
SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed.1 After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (docket entry #41) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
FootNotes
1. After the Magistrate Judge entered his Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition ruling on Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff, on February 18, 2014 [doc.#58], filed a response to Defendants' reply to Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. The Court has considered Plaintiff's response to Defendants' reply in reviewing the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition.
Source: Leagle
