WALLER v. CORIZON INC., 5:13CV00296 BSM. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140318703
Visitors: 30
Filed: Mar. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young has been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 23] is granted in part and denied in part. The
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young has been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 23] is granted in part and denied in part. The m..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young has been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 23] is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted as to any claim that plaintiff Kenneth Waller is attempting to pursue that arose on or before October 21, 2011, and such claims are dismissed with prejudice. The motion is denied in all other respects.
2. Waller's motion to amend [Doc. No. 26] and his motion for judgment [Doc. No. 31] are denied.
Source: Leagle
