PINDER v. HOBBS, 5:14CV00064 BSM. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140414635
Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2014
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been received, along with the objections filed thereto. After careful review of the findings and recommendations, and the objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253 and Rule 11 of
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been received, along with the objections filed thereto. After careful review of the findings and recommendations, and the objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253 and Rule 11 of ..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been received, along with the objections filed thereto. After careful review of the findings and recommendations, and the objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2554 Cases in the United States District Court, a determination must be made as to whether a certificate of appealability should be issued. In § 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). As there is no issue on which petitioner has made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
