Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HICKMAN v. HOBBS, 5:12-CV-00309 SWW-JTK. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20140508911 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 07, 2014
Latest Update: May 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After careful review of the findings and recommendations and the timely objections thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in a
More

ORDER

SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.

The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After careful review of the findings and recommendations and the timely objections thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

Accordingly, judgment shall be entered dismissing this petition with prejudice.1

The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The Court denies Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing [doc.#34].
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer