CONYEARS v. BRINKLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 2:11-cv-111-DPM. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140512i03
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 09, 2014
Latest Update: May 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. The Defendants' first motion in limine, N o 60 , is granted but without prejudice to reconsideration. The Plaintiffs may proffer specific facts at trial showing that any alleged crime is relevant to the disputed issues in the case. The Defendants' second motion in limine, N o 61 , is denied without prejudice. This issue will be explored at trial. To the extent that there is a question presented of judicial notice about who can prescribe med
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. The Defendants' first motion in limine, N o 60 , is granted but without prejudice to reconsideration. The Plaintiffs may proffer specific facts at trial showing that any alleged crime is relevant to the disputed issues in the case. The Defendants' second motion in limine, N o 61 , is denied without prejudice. This issue will be explored at trial. To the extent that there is a question presented of judicial notice about who can prescribe medi..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
The Defendants' first motion in limine, No 60, is granted but without prejudice to reconsideration. The Plaintiffs may proffer specific facts at trial showing that any alleged crime is relevant to the disputed issues in the case. The Defendants' second motion in limine, No 61, is denied without prejudice. This issue will be explored at trial. To the extent that there is a question presented of judicial notice about who can prescribe medicine, the Court will deal with it then.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
