ONSTAD v. HOBBS, 2:13CV00080 SWW. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140528d35
Visitors: 21
Filed: May 27, 2014
Latest Update: May 27, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the relevant record in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the relevant record in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court'..
More
ORDER
SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the relevant record in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (docket entry #69) is DENIED.
2. Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (docket entry #99), and their motions for summary judgment (docket entries #116 & #122) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
3. Plaintiff's motion to compel (docket entry #105) is DENIED.
4. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
Source: Leagle
