Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MAY v. RICHARD, 5:13CV00215-JLH-JJV. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20140606a03 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2014
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED tha
More

ORDER

J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff's Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:

1. Defendant "Unknown, Rehabilitation Program Manager, North Central Unit, ADC" is dismissed without prejudice.

2. Defendants' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED. Documents #24, #29.

3. This cause of action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer