JAMES v. HOBBS, 5:13CV00379 BSM. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140627846
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2014
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, Chief District Judge. The recommended disposition filed by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere has been reviewed, along with the objections filed. After de novo review and careful consideration, it is concluded that the recommendation should be, and hereby is, adopted in its entirety in all respects. Accordingly, Robert James's petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 1] is denied and dismissed with prejudice. It is further ordered, pursuant to Rule 11 of t
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, Chief District Judge. The recommended disposition filed by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere has been reviewed, along with the objections filed. After de novo review and careful consideration, it is concluded that the recommendation should be, and hereby is, adopted in its entirety in all respects. Accordingly, Robert James's petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 1] is denied and dismissed with prejudice. It is further ordered, pursuant to Rule 11 of th..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, Chief District Judge.
The recommended disposition filed by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere has been reviewed, along with the objections filed. After de novo review and careful consideration, it is concluded that the recommendation should be, and hereby is, adopted in its entirety in all respects.
Accordingly, Robert James's petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 1] is denied and dismissed with prejudice. It is further ordered, pursuant to Rule 11 of the rules governing section 2254 cases, that a certificate of appealability is denied because James has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2).
An appropriate judgment shall accompany this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
