HOPKINS v. HAYNES, 2:12-cv-00135 KGB-JTK. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140717829
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2014
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. The Court has carefully reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney and the timely objections thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, and the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 9). Mr. Hopkins's motion to compel is denied as moot (Dkt.
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. The Court has carefully reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney and the timely objections thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, and the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 9). Mr. Hopkins's motion to compel is denied as moot (Dkt. N..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney and the timely objections thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, and the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 9). Mr. Hopkins's motion to compel is denied as moot (Dkt. No. 11). Judgment shall be entered dismissing this case without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
