WILLIAMS v. HOBBS, 5:14CV00203 JM-BD. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140722527
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. The parties have not filed any objections to the Recommendation. After careful consideration, this Court adopts the Recommendation as its own. Wendell Dale Williams's petition for writ of habeas corpus (docket entry #2) is dismissed, without prejudice. When entering a final order adverse to a habeas corpus petitioner, the Court must issue or
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. The parties have not filed any objections to the Recommendation. After careful consideration, this Court adopts the Recommendation as its own. Wendell Dale Williams's petition for writ of habeas corpus (docket entry #2) is dismissed, without prejudice. When entering a final order adverse to a habeas corpus petitioner, the Court must issue or d..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. The parties have not filed any objections to the Recommendation.
After careful consideration, this Court adopts the Recommendation as its own. Wendell Dale Williams's petition for writ of habeas corpus (docket entry #2) is dismissed, without prejudice.
When entering a final order adverse to a habeas corpus petitioner, the Court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability. Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. A certificate of appealability may issue only if a petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). In this case, there is no basis for this court to issue a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
