CARTER v. JONES, 1:13-cv-77-DPM-JTR. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140729659
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. Despite having ample time to do so, Carter has not complied with the Court's Order in March directing him to respond to defendants' motion for partial summary judgment. No 30. This case is therefore dismissed without prejudice. Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). The motion for summary judgment, No 27, is denied as moot. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. Despite having ample time to do so, Carter has not complied with the Court's Order in March directing him to respond to defendants' motion for partial summary judgment. No 30. This case is therefore dismissed without prejudice. Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). The motion for summary judgment, No 27, is denied as moot. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C...
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
Despite having ample time to do so, Carter has not complied with the Court's Order in March directing him to respond to defendants' motion for partial summary judgment. No 30. This case is therefore dismissed without prejudice. Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). The motion for summary judgment, No 27, is denied as moot. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
