SPEARS v. MISSISSIPPI COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, 3:13CV00250-KGB-BD. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140729668
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER BETH DEERE, Magistrate Judge. Mr. Spears has moved to set aside the court order limiting the number of requests for admission that he may propound. (Docket entry #80) Defendants have responded to the motion and have also moved to strike the requests for admissions served on them on July 16, 2014;. (#82) Mr. Spears's motion (#80) is DENIED. The Defendants' motion (#82) is GRANTED. The requests for admissions received by the Defendants on July 16, 2014, need not be answered. Mr. Spears
Summary: ORDER BETH DEERE, Magistrate Judge. Mr. Spears has moved to set aside the court order limiting the number of requests for admission that he may propound. (Docket entry #80) Defendants have responded to the motion and have also moved to strike the requests for admissions served on them on July 16, 2014;. (#82) Mr. Spears's motion (#80) is DENIED. The Defendants' motion (#82) is GRANTED. The requests for admissions received by the Defendants on July 16, 2014, need not be answered. Mr. Spears h..
More
ORDER
BETH DEERE, Magistrate Judge.
Mr. Spears has moved to set aside the court order limiting the number of requests for admission that he may propound. (Docket entry #80) Defendants have responded to the motion and have also moved to strike the requests for admissions served on them on July 16, 2014;. (#82)
Mr. Spears's motion (#80) is DENIED. The Defendants' motion (#82) is GRANTED. The requests for admissions received by the Defendants on July 16, 2014, need not be answered.
Mr. Spears has also filed a motion in limine asking the Court to prohibit the Defendants from using his criminal background against him at trial. (#81) Mr. Spears has not provided a basis for the Court to grant this motion. Orders limiting the evidence presented to a jury are granted only as to matters that are irrelevant or unfairly prejudicial. It is too early in this lawsuit for the Court to make a determination about the admissibility of evidence. For that reason, the motion is DENIED as premature.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
