RODRIGUEZ v. HAYNES, 2:13-cv-00168 KGB/JTR. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140801683
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. On June 4, 2014, the Court gave plaintiff Jose Arteaga Rodriguez a final 30-day extension to file his response to defendants' motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion (Dkt. No. 20). Mr. Rodriguez was advised that if he did not timely file his response, his case would be dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). As of the date of this Order, Mr. Rodriguez has not filed his response, and the time for doing so has expired. Accordingly, th
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. On June 4, 2014, the Court gave plaintiff Jose Arteaga Rodriguez a final 30-day extension to file his response to defendants' motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion (Dkt. No. 20). Mr. Rodriguez was advised that if he did not timely file his response, his case would be dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). As of the date of this Order, Mr. Rodriguez has not filed his response, and the time for doing so has expired. Accordingly, thi..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
On June 4, 2014, the Court gave plaintiff Jose Arteaga Rodriguez a final 30-day extension to file his response to defendants' motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion (Dkt. No. 20). Mr. Rodriguez was advised that if he did not timely file his response, his case would be dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
As of the date of this Order, Mr. Rodriguez has not filed his response, and the time for doing so has expired. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice, and all pending motions are denied as moot. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
