JACKSON v. HOBBS, 5:13-cv-343-DPM-JJV. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140910625
Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. On de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Volpe's Proposed Findings and Recommendations, No 13, as modified. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3). Jackson's objections, No 18, are overruled. The Court declines to adopt the last three sentences (and embedded citations) in the first full paragraph on page 10 of the proposal. This material is surplusage. A certificate of appealability will not issue because Jackson hasn't made a substantial showing t
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. On de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Volpe's Proposed Findings and Recommendations, No 13, as modified. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3). Jackson's objections, No 18, are overruled. The Court declines to adopt the last three sentences (and embedded citations) in the first full paragraph on page 10 of the proposal. This material is surplusage. A certificate of appealability will not issue because Jackson hasn't made a substantial showing th..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
On de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Volpe's Proposed Findings and Recommendations, No 13, as modified. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3). Jackson's objections, No 18, are overruled. The Court declines to adopt the last three sentences (and embedded citations) in the first full paragraph on page 10 of the proposal. This material is surplusage. A certificate of appealability will not issue because Jackson hasn't made a substantial showing that the Constitution was violated in his case. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2).
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
