Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. BLEDSOE, 4:09-CR-00107-01-SWW. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20140923874 Visitors: 17
Filed: Sep. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. Defendant's pro se Motion to Reduce Based on the USSG Amendment 782 (Doc. No. 89) is DENIED. First, no person is entitled to relief under Amendment 782 (assuming the USSG's recommendation is accepted by Congress) until November 1, 2015, at the earliest. Second, even if Amendment 782 were currently in effect, Defendant would not qualify for relief. Defendant was sentenced to 120 months in prison, which was based on the statute not the Guidelines.
More

ORDER

SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.

Defendant's pro se Motion to Reduce Based on the USSG Amendment 782 (Doc. No. 89) is DENIED.

First, no person is entitled to relief under Amendment 782 (assuming the USSG's recommendation is accepted by Congress) until November 1, 2015, at the earliest.

Second, even if Amendment 782 were currently in effect, Defendant would not qualify for relief. Defendant was sentenced to 120 months in prison, which was based on the statute not the Guidelines. Additionally, as set out in the September 5, 2012 and May 3, 2013 Orders,1 Defendant was a career criminal, who had a total offense level of 31 and criminal history category VI. Even assuming Defendant were entitled to a 2 point reduction (and he may not be based on his career offender status), his range still would be 151-188 months, which is higher than his 120 months sentence.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Doc. Nos. 49, 64.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer