CROSSNO v. HOBBS, 5:14-cv-00259 BSM. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20141028716
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The findings and a recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been received. After careful consideration of the objections and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the findings and recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety and in all respects. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by petitioner Michael James Crossno is dismissed, all requested relief
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The findings and a recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been received. After careful consideration of the objections and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the findings and recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety and in all respects. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by petitioner Michael James Crossno is dismissed, all requested relief i..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The findings and a recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been received. After careful consideration of the objections and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the findings and recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety and in all respects. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by petitioner Michael James Crossno is dismissed, all requested relief is denied, and judgment will be entered for respondent Ray Hobbs. A certificate of appealability is denied. See Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases In The United States District Courts.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
