WILLIAMS v. HOBBS, 5:14CV00188 BSM. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20141105679
Visitors: 29
Filed: Nov. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 04, 2014
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommendations from Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been received. After careful consideration of the objections, and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. In 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommendations from Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been received. After careful consideration of the objections, and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. In 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. R..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommendations from Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been received. After careful consideration of the objections, and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety.
In § 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right on any issue. Thus, the certificate of appealability is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle