BLOCK v. PepsiCO, INC., 4:13CV00346 JLH. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20141106852
Visitors: 22
Filed: Nov. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2014
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this action with prejudice based on a settlement agreement into which they have entered. A motion to set aside the settlement agreement was previously denied by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney, and neither party now contests that decision. All issues regarding attorneys' fees have been resolved. Although the parties request the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreemen
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this action with prejudice based on a settlement agreement into which they have entered. A motion to set aside the settlement agreement was previously denied by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney, and neither party now contests that decision. All issues regarding attorneys' fees have been resolved. Although the parties request the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this action with prejudice based on a settlement agreement into which they have entered. A motion to set aside the settlement agreement was previously denied by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney, and neither party now contests that decision. All issues regarding attorneys' fees have been resolved. Although the parties request the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, the Court is not aware of any provisions in the agreement that remain to be enforced. The joint motion to dismiss with prejudice is GRANTED. Document #61. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
