HUTTS v. KELLEY, 5:14-cv-00269-KGB-JTK. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20141205690
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2014
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 8). After a review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto (Dkt. No. 14), as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, it is therefore ordered that plaintiff James Hutts's allegations that he was denied redress through the g
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 8). After a review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto (Dkt. No. 14), as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, it is therefore ordered that plaintiff James Hutts's allegations that he was denied redress through the gr..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 8). After a review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto (Dkt. No. 14), as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, it is therefore ordered that plaintiff James Hutts's allegations that he was denied redress through the grievance process in violation of his First Amendment rights is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
