CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. v. DAVIS, 4:14-cv-405-DPM. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20141211767
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. The Court appreciates Crop Production Services's supplement. The $1,350.00 fee requested is reasonable, especially in light of the commendable discount. The costs allowed by Rule 54 and the statute are $445.66. Postage is not recoverable; and the process fees aren't either because the U.S. Marshal didn't serve the papers. 28 U.S.C. 1920(1); Crues v. KFC Corp., 768 F.2d 230 , 234 (8th Cir. 1985). The Court sees no legal basis to cover these expense
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. The Court appreciates Crop Production Services's supplement. The $1,350.00 fee requested is reasonable, especially in light of the commendable discount. The costs allowed by Rule 54 and the statute are $445.66. Postage is not recoverable; and the process fees aren't either because the U.S. Marshal didn't serve the papers. 28 U.S.C. 1920(1); Crues v. KFC Corp., 768 F.2d 230 , 234 (8th Cir. 1985). The Court sees no legal basis to cover these expenses..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
The Court appreciates Crop Production Services's supplement. The $1,350.00 fee requested is reasonable, especially in light of the commendable discount. The costs allowed by Rule 54 and the statute are $445.66. Postage is not recoverable; and the process fees aren't either because the U.S. Marshal didn't serve the papers. 28 U.S.C. § 1920(1); Crues v. KFC Corp., 768 F.2d 230, 234 (8th Cir. 1985). The Court sees no legal basis to cover these expenses as part of the attorney's fee.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
