LAUDERDALE v. HOBBS, 5:13-cv-00040-KGB. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150220909
Visitors: 25
Filed: Feb. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2015
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 32). Petitioner Kitaka Lauderdale has filed objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 33), as well as a letter that the Court construes as supplemental objections (Dkt. No. 35). After careful review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations and the timely objections thereto, as well as a de novo r
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 32). Petitioner Kitaka Lauderdale has filed objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 33), as well as a letter that the Court construes as supplemental objections (Dkt. No. 35). After careful review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations and the timely objections thereto, as well as a de novo re..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 32). Petitioner Kitaka Lauderdale has filed objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 33), as well as a letter that the Court construes as supplemental objections (Dkt. No. 35). After careful review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations and the timely objections thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Petitioner's petition is hereby dismissed with prejudice and the request for relief is denied.
All remaining pending motions are denied as moot. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).
Accordingly, judgment shall be entered dismissing with prejudice this case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
