Filed: Feb. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT , District Judge . By order entered December 6, 2012 (ECF No. 50), the Court stayed this case pursuant to Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800 , 817, 96 S.Ct. 1236 (1976), in deference to a concurrent state-court case. Based on information set forth in recently-filed status reports (ECF Nos. 57, 58), it is still possible that the parties' dispute will return to this Court. However, the case will be administratively terminated f
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT , District Judge . By order entered December 6, 2012 (ECF No. 50), the Court stayed this case pursuant to Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800 , 817, 96 S.Ct. 1236 (1976), in deference to a concurrent state-court case. Based on information set forth in recently-filed status reports (ECF Nos. 57, 58), it is still possible that the parties' dispute will return to this Court. However, the case will be administratively terminated fo..
More
ORDER
SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.
By order entered December 6, 2012 (ECF No. 50), the Court stayed this case pursuant to Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 817, 96 S.Ct. 1236 (1976), in deference to a concurrent state-court case. Based on information set forth in recently-filed status reports (ECF Nos. 57, 58), it is still possible that the parties' dispute will return to this Court. However, the case will be administratively terminated for reporting purposes until such time as a party files a motion to restore the case to the active docket and the Court determines that the case should be reactivated.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively terminate this case for reporting purposes.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
