HARP v. NORRIS, 5:15CV00067-BSM-JJV. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150506635
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 05, 2015
Latest Update: May 05, 2015
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's failure to train allegations against defendants Larry Manning a
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's failure to train allegations against defendants Larry Manning an..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's failure to train allegations against defendants Larry Manning and James Gibson are dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
2. Defendants Wendy Kelley, Larry Norris, and Derwin Metcalf are dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted against them.
3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
