Filed: May 22, 2015
Latest Update: May 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's retaliation, disciplinary, and grievance claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. Defendants Baker, Banister, Faust, Banks, Evans, Nay
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's retaliation, disciplinary, and grievance claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. Defendants Baker, Banister, Faust, Banks, Evans, Nayl..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that
1. Plaintiff's retaliation, disciplinary, and grievance claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
2. Defendants Baker, Banister, Faust, Banks, Evans, Naylor, Lawrence, and Griffin, are DISMISSED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
