SCOTT v. GRAY, 5:13CV00330 BSM. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150611898
Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2015
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The proposed findings and recommended disposition ("RD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and Willie Scott's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the RD are hereby adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 65] is granted. 2. All claims against Gray and Watt are dismissed
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The proposed findings and recommended disposition ("RD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and Willie Scott's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the RD are hereby adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 65] is granted. 2. All claims against Gray and Watt are dismissed w..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition ("RD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and Willie Scott's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the RD are hereby adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 65] is granted.
2. All claims against Gray and Watt are dismissed with prejudice.
3. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that in forma pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment will not be take in good faith.
Source: Leagle
