VAN DYKE v. TRUMANN SCHOOL DISTRICT, 3:14-cv-00051 KGB. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150710757
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Plaintiff Wanda Van Dyke has filed a motion to compel settlement (Dkt. No. 31), to which defendants have responded (Dkt. No. 32). The parties have communicated to the Court that the settlement funds have been disbursed to Ms. Van Dyke, and Ms. Van Dyke has communicated that she no longer wishes to pursue her motion to compel. Accordingly, the Court denies as moot Ms. Van Dyke's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 31). As noted in the Court's April 9, 2015,
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Plaintiff Wanda Van Dyke has filed a motion to compel settlement (Dkt. No. 31), to which defendants have responded (Dkt. No. 32). The parties have communicated to the Court that the settlement funds have been disbursed to Ms. Van Dyke, and Ms. Van Dyke has communicated that she no longer wishes to pursue her motion to compel. Accordingly, the Court denies as moot Ms. Van Dyke's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 31). As noted in the Court's April 9, 2015, O..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Wanda Van Dyke has filed a motion to compel settlement (Dkt. No. 31), to which defendants have responded (Dkt. No. 32). The parties have communicated to the Court that the settlement funds have been disbursed to Ms. Van Dyke, and Ms. Van Dyke has communicated that she no longer wishes to pursue her motion to compel. Accordingly, the Court denies as moot Ms. Van Dyke's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 31). As noted in the Court's April 9, 2015, Order, this case will remain open until the parties submit dismissal paperwork and the Court enters an order of dismissal. Furthermore, Ms. Van Dyke has communicated to the Court that she considers this matter closed. Therefore, the Court dismisses this action.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
