COOPER v. GRISWOLD, 5:15CV00170-BSM-JJV. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20151214565
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and the plaintiff's objections thereto have been reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, the partial recommended disposition is hereby adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 49] is granted; A. Defendants Marie Austin and William Warren are
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and the plaintiff's objections thereto have been reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, the partial recommended disposition is hereby adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 49] is granted; A. Defendants Marie Austin and William Warren are ..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and the plaintiff's objections thereto have been reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, the partial recommended disposition is hereby adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 49] is granted;
A. Defendants Marie Austin and William Warren are dismissed with prejudice.
B. Defendant Shirley Lubin is dismissed without prejudice.
2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
