McCLANTON v. BREVING, 5:15-cv-00230-KGB/JTK. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20151218a33
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court are two Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. Nos. 4, 24). Magistrate Kearney first recommends dismissal of defendant Robert Brewing (Dkt. No. 4). After a review of those Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto (Dkt. No. 6), as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court are two Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. Nos. 4, 24). Magistrate Kearney first recommends dismissal of defendant Robert Brewing (Dkt. No. 4). After a review of those Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto (Dkt. No. 6), as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in t..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
Before the Court are two Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. Nos. 4, 24). Magistrate Kearney first recommends dismissal of defendant Robert Brewing (Dkt. No. 4). After a review of those Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto (Dkt. No. 6), as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety. Accordingly, the Court orders that defendant Breving be dismissed without prejudice as a defendant in this case for failure to state a claim against him upon which relief may be granted.
Magistrate Kearney's second Proposed Findings and Recommendations addresses defendant Estella Bland's motion to vacate Mr. McClanton's in forma pauperis status (Dkt. No. 24). Ms. Bland has not filed objections, and the time to do so has passed. After a review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. The Court denies Ms. Bland's motion to vacate Mr. McClanton's in forma pauperis status.
It is so ordered.
Source: Leagle
