CASTILLO v. KELLEY, 5:14CV00368 JM/BD. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160105610
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. In addition, the Court has considered Mr. Castillo's objections to the Recommendation and has reviewed de novo those portions of the record relevant to Mr. Castillo's objections. After careful consideration, this Court adopts the Recommendation as its own. Petitioner Rene Villegas Castillo's petition for writ of habeas corpus (docket ent
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. In addition, the Court has considered Mr. Castillo's objections to the Recommendation and has reviewed de novo those portions of the record relevant to Mr. Castillo's objections. After careful consideration, this Court adopts the Recommendation as its own. Petitioner Rene Villegas Castillo's petition for writ of habeas corpus (docket entr..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. In addition, the Court has considered Mr. Castillo's objections to the Recommendation and has reviewed de novo those portions of the record relevant to Mr. Castillo's objections. After careful consideration, this Court adopts the Recommendation as its own. Petitioner Rene Villegas Castillo's petition for writ of habeas corpus (docket entry #2) is denied and dismissed, with prejudice.
When entering a final order adverse to a habeas corpus petitioner, the Court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability. Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. A certificate of appealability may issue only if a petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). In this case, there is no basis for this court to issue a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability is denied.
Source: Leagle
