IPSCO TUBULARS, INC. v. AJAX TOCCO MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION, 3:10CV00021 BSM. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160106763
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2016
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , Chief District Judge . IPSCO's request [Doc. No. 208] to reinstate its motion for fees and costs [Doc. No. 171] is granted and said motion is hereby reinstated. IPSCO motion's for leave to file its previously-prepared memorandum in opposition to Ajax's original motion for leave to file a sur-reply [Doc. No. 210] is granted and the clerk is directed to docket IPSCO's proposed opposition attached as exhibit A to its reply [Doc. No. 210]. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, Chief District Judge.
IPSCO's request [Doc. No. 208] to reinstate its motion for fees and costs [Doc. No. 171] is granted and said motion is hereby reinstated. IPSCO motion's for leave to file its previously-prepared memorandum in opposition to Ajax's original motion for leave to file a sur-reply [Doc. No. 210] is granted and the clerk is directed to docket IPSCO's proposed opposition attached as exhibit A to its reply [Doc. No. 210].
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
