U.S. v. ANSTISS, 4:14CR114-05-DPM. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160115f91
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2016
Summary: ORDER BETH DEERE , Magistrate Judge . The parties report an agreement to modify Defendant Kristopher Michael Anstiss's pretrial release conditions in lieu of the Government's pursuit of bond revocation. The proposed modification requires that Mr. Anstiss re-enter a chemical-free living program pending resolution of his case. For good cause shown, the requested modification is granted. The revocation hearing scheduled for January 13, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. is canceled, and the motion to revok
Summary: ORDER BETH DEERE , Magistrate Judge . The parties report an agreement to modify Defendant Kristopher Michael Anstiss's pretrial release conditions in lieu of the Government's pursuit of bond revocation. The proposed modification requires that Mr. Anstiss re-enter a chemical-free living program pending resolution of his case. For good cause shown, the requested modification is granted. The revocation hearing scheduled for January 13, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. is canceled, and the motion to revoke..
More
ORDER
BETH DEERE, Magistrate Judge.
The parties report an agreement to modify Defendant Kristopher Michael Anstiss's pretrial release conditions in lieu of the Government's pursuit of bond revocation. The proposed modification requires that Mr. Anstiss re-enter a chemical-free living program pending resolution of his case.
For good cause shown, the requested modification is granted. The revocation hearing scheduled for January 13, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. is canceled, and the motion to revoke bond (Docket entry #468) is denied as moot.
Mr. Anstiss is ordered to enter a chemical-free living program as instructed by his Pretrial Services Officer. He must remain in the chemical-free living program until resolution of his case. Any request by Mr. Anstiss for weekend passes to stay with his wife and child should be made directly to the program coordinator, without further authorization by the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
