MOORE v. LUSKS, 4:14-cv-147-DPM. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160115n29
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 14, 2016
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr. , District Judge . The Court would appreciate an expedited response to Defendants' motion in limine, N o. 37, by 19 January 2016, so we can cover those issues at the pretrial. The Court also wonders about subject matter jurisdiction, and would like to hear from the parties about that at the, too. If Moore intends to move in limine on any issue, she should do so by January 19th. And Defendants should be prepared to respond orally at the pretrial. So Ordered.
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
The Court would appreciate an expedited response to Defendants' motion in limine, No. 37, by 19 January 2016, so we can cover those issues at the pretrial. The Court also wonders about subject matter jurisdiction, and would like to hear from the parties about that at the, too. If Moore intends to move in limine on any issue, she should do so by January 19th. And Defendants should be prepared to respond orally at the pretrial.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
