Green v. Kelley, 5:14CV00313 BSM. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160209670
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The proposed findings and recommended disposition ("RD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and petitioner's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration, the RD are hereby adopted in all respects and Garland James Green's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed with prejudice. In 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the petition
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The proposed findings and recommended disposition ("RD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and petitioner's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration, the RD are hereby adopted in all respects and Garland James Green's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed with prejudice. In 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the petitione..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition ("RD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and petitioner's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration, the RD are hereby adopted in all respects and Garland James Green's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed with prejudice.
In § 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). Accordingly, a certificate of appealability is denied because Green has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle