Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Smith v. Hobbs, 5:14-cv-71-DPM. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20160210927 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT D.P. MARSHALL Jr. , District Judge . 1. Smith's claims against Compton and Aiken are voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. 2. Smith's claims against Hobbs, May, Harris, Smart, Lowe, Jackson, West, Foote, Naylor, Alexander, Scussel, Wheeler, Tyler, and Musselwhite are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. 3. Smith's claims about magazine issues other than Rolling Stone 1159, Ebony July 2012, and Ebony June 2013 are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exh
More

JUDGMENT

1. Smith's claims against Compton and Aiken are voluntarily dismissed without prejudice.

2. Smith's claims against Hobbs, May, Harris, Smart, Lowe, Jackson, West, Foote, Naylor, Alexander, Scussel, Wheeler, Tyler, and Musselwhite are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust.

3. Smith's claims about magazine issues other than Rolling Stone 1159, Ebony July 2012, and Ebony June 2013 are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust.

4. Smith's Equal Protection claims involving inmates Darrell Lovett and Jeremy Thompson are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust.

5. Smith's official capacity claims for money damages are dismissed with prejudice based on sovereign immunity.

6. Smith's remaining claims against Cashion, Falls, and Clark are dismissed with prejudice based on qualified immunity.

So Ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer