Wearing v. Haynes, 2:13CV00163 JLH/JTR. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160223733
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2016
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Supplemental Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Supplemental Recommended Disposition should be, and it hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety and in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Supplemental Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Supplemental Recommended Disposition should be, and it hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety and in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this p..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Supplemental Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed.
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Supplemental Recommended Disposition should be, and it hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety and in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DENIED, and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
