Thacker v. Kelley, 5:14CV00129 BSM. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160511760
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 10, 2016
Latest Update: May 10, 2016
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris and plaintiff's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition is hereby adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 51] is granted, and Thacker's complaint is dismissed. 2. Thacker's compla
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris and plaintiff's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition is hereby adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 51] is granted, and Thacker's complaint is dismissed. 2. Thacker's complai..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris and plaintiff's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition is hereby adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 51] is granted, and Thacker's complaint is dismissed.
2. Thacker's complaint is dismissed without prejudice with respect to his claims against Wendy Kelley and Sharon King, and the complaint is dismissed with prejudice with respect to his claims against all other defendants.
3. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
