Johnson v. Richard, 1:15CV00056-JM-JTK. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160518729
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 17, 2016
Latest Update: May 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 87) be GRANTED. 2. Defendant's Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 91) be GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff's Complaint be D
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 87) be GRANTED. 2. Defendant's Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 91) be GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff's Complaint be DI..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 87) be GRANTED.
2. Defendant's Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 91) be GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice.
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
