DeWald v. Stewart, 4:16CV00155 JLH/JTR. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160518734
Visitors: 24
Filed: May 17, 2016
Latest Update: May 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. DeWald's motions for a preliminary injunction (Documents #3 & #7) are denied. 2. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis a
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. DeWald's motions for a preliminary injunction (Documents #3 & #7) are denied. 2. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis ap..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. DeWald's motions for a preliminary injunction (Documents #3 & #7) are denied.
2. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
