U.S. v. RAMER, 4:14CR00191-04-JLH. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160526773
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 25, 2016
Latest Update: May 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . Pending is defendant Nathan Ramer's Motion for Two Point Reduction based on Sentencing Guideline Amendment 782. At sentencing on November 24, 2015, defendant had a total offense level of 29 (because he was responsible for between 500 grams and 1.5 kilograms of methamphetamine) and a criminal history category of VI. His guideline range was 151-188 months. So, Amendment 782 was considered when defendant's guideline range was calculated. Furthermore, d
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . Pending is defendant Nathan Ramer's Motion for Two Point Reduction based on Sentencing Guideline Amendment 782. At sentencing on November 24, 2015, defendant had a total offense level of 29 (because he was responsible for between 500 grams and 1.5 kilograms of methamphetamine) and a criminal history category of VI. His guideline range was 151-188 months. So, Amendment 782 was considered when defendant's guideline range was calculated. Furthermore, de..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
Pending is defendant Nathan Ramer's Motion for Two Point Reduction based on Sentencing Guideline Amendment 782.
At sentencing on November 24, 2015, defendant had a total offense level of 29 (because he was responsible for between 500 grams and 1.5 kilograms of methamphetamine) and a criminal history category of VI. His guideline range was 151-188 months. So, Amendment 782 was considered when defendant's guideline range was calculated. Furthermore, defendant was sentenced to the mandatory minimum of 120 months. Documents #530 and #531.
Accordingly, defendant's Motion for Two Point Reduction is DENIED. Document #729.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
