Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Haynes v. Greene County Detention Center, 3:16CV00026-BSM-JJV. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20160729680 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2016
Summary: PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INSTRUCTIONS JOE J. VOLPE , Magistrate Judge . The following recommended disposition has been sent to Chief United States District Judge Brian S. Miller. Any party may serve and file written objections to this recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the evidence that supports your objection. An original
More

PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INSTRUCTIONS

The following recommended disposition has been sent to Chief United States District Judge Brian S. Miller. Any party may serve and file written objections to this recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the evidence that supports your objection. An original and one copy of your objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later than fourteen days from the date of the findings and recommendations. The copy will be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact.

If you are objecting to the recommendation and also desire to submit new, different, or additional evidence, and to have a hearing for this purpose before either the District Judge or Magistrate Judge, you must, at the time you file your written objections, include the following:

1. Why the record made before the Magistrate Judge is inadequate. 2. Why the evidence to be proffered at the new hearing (if such a hearing is granted) was not offered at the hearing before the Magistrate Judge. 3. The details of any testimony desired to be introduced at the new hearing in the form of an offer of proof, and a copy, or the original, of any documentary or other non-testimonial evidence desired to be introduced at the new hearing.

From this submission, the District Judge will determine the necessity for an additional evidentiary hearing. Mail your objections and "Statement of Necessity" to:

Clerk, United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149 Little Rock, AR 72201-3325

DISPOSITION

Justin Allen Haynes ("Plaintiff") filed this § 1983 action on January 28, 2016. (Doc. No. 2). On June 1, 2016, I ordered Plaintiff to notify the Court of his current address. (Doc. No. 31.) Plaintiff has failed to comply with that Order within the thirty-day deadline. Accordingly, I recommend this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2)1

IT IS, THEREFORE, RECOMMENDED THAT:

1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 2) be DISMISSED without prejudice.

FootNotes


1. Local Rule of the Court 5.5(c)(2), states: It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to monitor the progress of the case, and to prosecute or defend the action diligently. A party appearing for himself/herself shall sign his/her pleadings and state his/her address, zip code, and telephone number. If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. Any party proceeding pro se shall be expected to be familiar with and follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Loc. R. 5.5(c)(2)

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer