GARDNER v. ANDREWS, 5:15-cv-00231 JM. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160915b69
Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 14, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has received findings and a recommendation from Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Docket No. 56). No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. The motion for preliminary injunction filed by plaintiff Wallace A. Gardner (Document No. 46) is denied. IT IS S
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has received findings and a recommendation from Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Docket No. 56). No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. The motion for preliminary injunction filed by plaintiff Wallace A. Gardner (Document No. 46) is denied. IT IS SO..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
The Court has received findings and a recommendation from Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Docket No. 56). No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. The motion for preliminary injunction filed by plaintiff Wallace A. Gardner (Document No. 46) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
